A.M. GORKY INSTITUTE OF WORLD LITERATURE
“Considering Every Word”: In Memory of Irina Zaitseva
- DOI:
- EDN:
- УДК / UDK: 821.161.1.1
- Publication Type: Research Article
- Received: 18.01.2026
- Approved after reviewing: 16.06.2026
- Date of publication: 25.09.2026
- Issue:
no. 3 (41), 2026
- Abstract:
This article examines the commentary practices of Irina Arkadyevna Zaitseva (1951–2024), a leading research fellow at the Department of Russian Literature of the Institute of World Literature (IWL RAS), who worked as part of the Institute’s academic team on the preparation of the Complete Works of Nikolay Gogol. The material for the article draws on I.A. Zaitseva’s scholarly writings, which contain reflections on her own experience as a commentator, as well as her personal correspondence with the author of this publication. The study describes various commentary strategies employed by Zaitseva in tracing the history of the text, identifying and presenting its critical reception, and compiling the realia commentary. A separate section of the article is devoted to the ethics of commentary. The article formulates the principles that guided Zaitseva in her work. These include a creatively critical approach to the legacy of previous generations of commentators; reliance on firsthand study of primary sources, with the possibility of expanding their corpus in cases of “fading manuscripts”; a commitment to uncovering and presenting to the reader the distinctive features of the individual creative process; the use of a hermeneutic approach in conveying the critical reception of a classical text; a clear distinction between “scholarly commentary” and a scholarly or dictionary article; adherence to both scholarly criteria (factual accuracy and richness, an annalistic quality) and aesthetic requirements (style, tempo, precision of wording) for the commentary text; and the search for a “key” that would reveal the specific poetics of the text under study and determine the most effective manner of presenting the research material. The article also addresses Zaitseva’s personal intellectual stance, as she actively believed in the value and significance of commentary work, holding that the publication of classics shapes the development of national culture and national identity.
- Keywords: textual scholarship, commentary, text history, realia commentary, Nikolay Gogol, Irina Zaitseva
- For citation:
Balakshina, Yu.V. “‘Considering Every Word’: In Memory of Irina Zaitseva.” Literaturnyi fakt, no. 3 (41), 2026, pp. 429–447. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2026-41-429-447
- References:
- Barsht, A. “O napravleniiakh i predelakh kommentirovaniia khudozhestvennogo teksta” [“On the Directions and Limits of Commenting on a Literary Text”]. Voprosy literatury, no. 5, 2009, pp. 280–303. (In Russ.)
- Berezkin, M. “Kognitivnye i prikladnye aspekty sovremennoi tekstologii” [“Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Modern Textual Criticism”]. Russkaia literatura, no. 1, 2005, pp. 67–80. (In Russ.)
- Gasparov, L. “Iu.M. Lotman i problemy kommentirovaniia” [“Yu.M. Lotman and the Problems of Commenting”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 2 (66), 2004, pp. 70–74. (In Russ.)
- Gogol, V. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem: v 23 t. [Complete Works and Letters: in 23 vols.]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2009–. (In Russ.)
- Dmitrieva, E. “Izdanie Gogolia: problema eticheskaia, esteticheskaia, tekstologicheskaia” [“Gogol’s Edition: An Ethical, Aesthetic, and Textual Problem”]. Problemy tekstologii i editsionnoi praktiki: Opyt frantsuzsko-russkikh issledovatelei [Problems of Textual Criticism and Editorial Practice: The Experience of French-Russian Research], ex. ed. by M. Delon and E.E. Dmitrieva. Moscow, OGI Publ, 2003, pp. 33–50. (In Russ.)
- Isupov, K. “Vnenakhodimost’ kommentatora” [“The Commentator’s Otherness”]. Voprosy literatury, no. 2, 2008, pp. 2–19. (In Russ.)
- Zaitseva, A. “‘Velikii poet, velikii khudozhnik byl peredo mnoiu…’ (Gogol’ v memuarakh I.S. Turgeneva)” [“‘A Great Poet, a Great Artist Was Before Me…’ (Nikolai Gogol in the Memoirs of Ivan Turgenev)”]. Neevklidova geometriia Iuriia Manna: pamiati uchenogo [The Non-Euclidean Geometry of Yuri Mann: In Memoriam], ex. ed. by E.E. Dmitrieva. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2024, pp. 364‒375. https://doi.org/10.22455/978-5-9208-0754-0-364-375 (In Russ.)
- Zaitseva, A. “Pis’mo Gogolia roditeliam ot avgusta 1822 goda (istoriia publikatsii, sud’ba avtografa, istochniki teksta)” [“Gogol’s Letter to His Parents Dated August 1822 (Publication History, Fate of the Autograph, Sources of the Text)”]. N.V. Gogol’: Materialy i issledovaniia [N.V. Gogol: Materials and Research], vol. 4. Moscow, IW RAS Publ., 2019, pp. 49–62. (In Russ.)
- Zaitseva, A. “Problemy publikatsii pisem Gogolia 1820–1824 gg. (tsenzurnyi ekzempliar piatogo toma Sochinenii i pisem N.V. Gogolia izdaniia P.A. Kulisha kak tekstologicheskii istochnik)” [“Problems of Publishing Gogol’s Letters from 1820–1824 (The Censored Copy of the Fifth Volume of N.V. Gogol’s Works and Letters Published by P.A. Kulish as a Textual Source)”]. Voprosy istochnikovedeniia i tekstologii russkoi literatury XIX veka: sbornik statei po materialam Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Issues of Source Studies and Textual Analysis of 19th-Century Russian Literature: A Collection of Articles Based on the Materials of the International Scientific Conference]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2022, pp. 78–88. (In Russ.)
- Zaitseva, A. “‘Tridtsat’ piat’ tysiach kur’erov’ (‘stsena vran’ia’ v gogolevskom ‘Revizore’: istoriia sozdaniia i publikatsii)” [“‘Thirty-Five Thousand Couriers’ (‘The Scene of Lies’ in Gogol’s ‘The Inspector General’: The History of Creation and Publication)”]. Ot istorii teksta k istorii literatury [From the History of the Text to the History of Literature], vol. 2, ex. ed. M.I. Shcherbakova. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2019, pp. 163–190. (In Russ.)
- Zenkin, S. “Kommentarii i ego dvoinik” [“Commentary and Its Double”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 2 (66), 2004, pp. 75–81. (In Russ.)
- Mann, V. “N.V. Gogol’: akademicheskii kommentarii v poiskakh zhanra” [“N.V. Gogol: Academic Commentary in Search of a Genre”]. Problemy tekstologii i editsionnoi praktiki: Opyt frantsuzsko-russkikh issledovatelei [Problems of Textual Criticism and Editorial Practice: The Experience of French-Russian Research], ex. ed. M. Delon and E.E. Dmitrieva. Moscow, OGI Publ., 2003, pp. 103–111. (In Russ.)
- Morozov, N. “Voprosy kommentirovaniia rannikh rasskazov I.A. Bunina 1887–1902 gg.” [“Some Issues of Commenting Ivan Bunin’s Early Stories of 1887–1902”]. Studia Litterarum, vol. 8, no. 3, 2023, pp. 194–213. https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-194-213 (In Russ.)
- Stepanov, D. “Tipologiia neponimaniia teksta i zadachi kommentirovaniia” [“Typology of Misunderstanding of a Text and the Tasks of Commenting”]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Iazyk i literatura, vol. 19, no. 4, 2022, pp. 710–719. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2022.404 (In Russ.)
- Tekst i kommentarii: kruglyi stol k 75-letiiu Vs. Ivanova [Text and Commentary: A Round Table Dedicated to the 75th Anniversary of Vyacheslav Ivanov]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006. 420 p. (In Russ.)
- Tikhomirov, N. “Lazar’! griadi von”. Roman F.M. Dostoevskogo “Prestuplenie i nakazanie” v sovremennom prochtenii: Kniga-kommentarii [“Lazarus! Come out”. F.M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “Crime and Punishment” in a Modern Interpretation: A Book Commentary]. St. Petersburg, Serebrianyi vek Publ., 2005. 472 p. (In Russ.)
- Frolov, A. “‘Nakoplen ogromnyi opyt, no ne obobshchen…’: Neopublikovannye vystupleniia i zametki Iu.G. Oksmana” [“‘Great Experience Has Been Accumulated, But Not Generalized…’: Unpublished Reports and Notes by J.G. Oksman”]. Literaturnyi fakt, no. 9, 2018, pp. 384–436. https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2018-9-384-436 (In Russ.)
- Chudakov, “K probleme total’nogo kommentariia ‘Evgeniia Onegina’.” [“On the Problem of Total Commentary on ‘Eugene Onegin’.”]. Pushkinskii sbornik [The Pushkin Collection], comp. by I. Loshhilov and I. Surat. Moscow, Tri kvadrata Publ., 2005, pp. 210–237. (In Russ.)
